New S.O.B Website!

New School of Budo website up!



I’ve actually been writing quite a bit, if not posting so much. I’ve found lately that nothing I write is all that different or special compared to the usual blogosphere blather. I’ll be expanding on this as more thoughts strike me:


Beware of group think. Beware being involved in a group where one person spouts a debatable point but no debate is tolerated, or it is argued down. It’s amazing how many groups start acting like this. It emboldens people who don’t really have a complete understanding into thinking they do have understanding.

For when debate is stamped out, or when the arguments grow too tiresome, people stop questioning. When people stop questioning, if then questionable statements arise, there is no one there to question them.

And they are accepted as undebatable. These then become truth, when they are nothing of the sort.


Yet another video of a street fight. Two shirtless males squared off, surrounded by people with their phones out, duking it out and rolling around in the grass.

But why in the world is it being conflated, mistaken for, and used as a measure of the effectiveness of a method of self-defense?  By people who should know better.

They are completely different things. A self defense encounter is not “MMA-for-Da-Streetz. ” Are you training your students to be like this? Are you teaching them self defense based on this kind of encounter?


Straw men are easily constructed, and readily torn down, particularly when our only understanding is through a combined platform of a computer screen, a dojo mat, and a square range.


Take a minute to check yourself before you teach others something you have never actually done. You’ve only ever trained it, you have no direct knowledge of the thing itself.

Personally I don’t know how people can actually be comfortable in doing this, but I am not them. To each his own.

And take a LOOONNNGGG minute to check yourself before you lecture others on teaching something they have done, maybe a lot, when you have – again – never done anything.  Never been tested. Never been proven in the eyes of your peers.

You haven’t earned the right….


Maybe it’s me, but I don’t trust when people have only a few years in an armed profession then left, and then have spent the last two decades teaching the very things that they could have continued to do for real in the profession.

If they were that interested and invested, why’d they leave?

Of course the answer could be completely innocuous. But often, it’s not. There is another reason. I know several examples of well known trainers that fit in this latter box.

If they left in disgrace, I have a problem with that. I also have a problem if they chose not to continue to field test, prove themselves, and perfect their craft because it was easier – and less risky to their person, their ego, or their reputation – to step aside and sell their craft on those few years of experience alone.

Then again, we have the twenty or thirty year experienced “veterans” teaching tactics, firearms, combatives, whatever. But twenty or thirty years of what kind of experience?

Because in many cases these people have worked the last decades behind a desk.

That’s a different thing. Especially if it was purely  administrative positions they moved into. In the latter case, basically they are among those that  “left” the profession after only a few years…


Some people just can’t teach. Regardless of experience or skill level.

Some people have skill but no experience. If they can teach, learn skills from them.

Some have experience but no skill. Learn – something  – from them.

But can you tell the difference?


EVERYONE is off duty some time.

The more serious armed professionals carry concealed, off duty, and at times are concerned about people they have arrested or been involved in taking down coming after them and their families.

So, to dismiss what some “spec ops commando” has to offer for concealed carry self-defense because he “only works with a long gun and in a plate carrier and with a team,” or what some cop brings to the table because they have only worked “in uniform” and “under color of authority,”” is to make a grave mistake.

First of all, you have no idea what they actually did or do on the job if you think that is the only way in which they work. We do know what spec ops actually does, right?

And second, even when off duty, and carrying what every other concealed carrier out there does, working under the same laws, they also carry with them their brains. Their knowledge, their ability to assess a tactical situation when real shots are fired (not simunitions, which alone cause most people to freak out when they are introduced in training), to be decisive, and to do so many other things that people without the same experience cannot do with composure.

So fine, don’t take the rifle and plate carrier, running-and-gunning class. But use your common sense as to what those may have people have to offer.


If all you’ve ever done is look at porn, you won’t know what you think you do about real sex.


Is it odd that we all decry the low level of training and standards in the law enforcement world, and yet when we talk about individuals, we make sure to point out either that they were in law enforcement for some period of time, those that were list law enforcement teaching credentials, or at the very least, people make sure to note in their bios that they trained law enforcement officers.

Instilling Anxiety

Posted these on some forums – about instilling anxiety in our training. That is a must to get the most out of training: injecting opposing will, a pain penalty, ambiguity, and decision making.

It’s not just about – can’t be just about – training technique.

Old Meets New

At Grapplearts, Stephan Kesting and Alex Kask of the Bichu-den Takeuchi-ryu compare and contrast Japanese and Brazilian Jiujitsu, noting some of the differences in the classical approach in terms of armed environments as well as tactical considerations.

Awareness of the roots and history of jujitsu can only grow our understanding and appreciation of the art, in particular as it relates to a combative or personal defense application.

BTW, BJJ may have a more direct influence from classical jujitsu than simply through judo – specifically from the Takeuchi-ryu.